CATEGORY: Linux <h2>Introduction</h2> <p>In a surprising turn of events, Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel, has publicly rejected proposed changes to the MultiMediaCard (MMC) subsystem for the upcoming Linux 7.0 cycle. His blunt assessment of the changes as "complete garbage" has sent shockwaves through the open-source community and sparked intense debate about the direction of kernel development.</h2> <h2>The Controversial MMC Changes</h2> <p>The proposed changes to the MMC subsystem were intended to improve performance and add new features for memory card support in Linux. However, the implementation faced significant criticism from Torvalds and other kernel maintainers. The changes reportedly introduced complexity without clear benefits and potentially compromised system stability.</p> <h2>Torvalds' Criticism Explained</h2> <p>Torvalds' harsh criticism wasn't just about the code quality but also about the development process. He emphasized that kernel development should prioritize stability, simplicity, and maintainability over flashy new features. His "complete garbage" comment reflected frustration with what he saw as unnecessary complexity being introduced into a critical system component.</p> <h2>Impact on Linux 7.0 Development</h2> <p>The rejection of these MMC changes has created a significant setback for the Linux 7.0 development cycle. Developers now need to revisit their approach to memory card support, potentially delaying the release or forcing them to find alternative solutions that meet Torvalds' strict standards for kernel code quality.</p> <h2>Community Reaction</h2> <p>The Linux community has been divided in its response. Some developers support Torvalds' stance on maintaining high code quality standards, while others argue that his criticism was too harsh and could discourage innovation. The debate highlights the ongoing tension between stability and progress in open-source development.</p> <h2>Lessons for Kernel Development</h2> <p>This incident serves as a reminder of the rigorous standards that kernel code must meet. Key takeaways include: <ul> <li>Code must be thoroughly tested before submission</li> <li>Simplicity should be prioritized over complexity</li> <li>Maintainability is crucial for long-term success</li> <li>Community feedback is essential in the development process</li> </ul></p> <h2>The Future of MMC Support</h2> <p>Despite this setback, MMC support remains crucial for Linux systems. Developers are now working on alternative approaches that address the original goals while meeting the kernel's quality standards. This may result in more incremental improvements rather than sweeping changes.</p> <h2>FAQ</h2> <p><strong>Q: What is MMC in Linux?</strong><br> A: MMC (MultiMediaCard) is a subsystem in the Linux kernel that handles memory card support, including SD cards and other removable storage devices.</p> <p><strong>Q: Why did Torvalds reject the changes?</strong><br> A: He found the implementation to be overly complex, potentially unstable, and not meeting the kernel's quality standards.</p> <p><strong>Q: Will this delay Linux 7.0?</strong><br> A: It may cause some delays as developers need to rework their approach to MMC support.</p> <p><strong>Q: What are the alternatives being considered?</strong><br> A: Developers are exploring more incremental improvements that maintain stability while adding necessary features.</p> <h2>Conclusion</h2> <p>The rejection of MMC changes for Linux 7.0 by Linus Torvalds underscores the importance of maintaining high standards in kernel development. While the "complete garbage" comment may seem harsh, it reflects the critical nature of kernel code and the need for careful, thoughtful development practices. As the Linux community moves forward, this incident will likely influence how future changes are proposed and reviewed.</p> <p><a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZEFVX3lxTE9hcWwyUlBLcHdDeFdTZkt2MEFqYjJpNmJMVmFqWEtBc0oyZjRQQmhuQzRaUVdDc2w1UEtTbExxU01EVlJWYmRVRkg5R3k0MHRZNjlBR1dBdGFoNXNsR2VBZU9vSEw?oc=5">Read more</a></p>